Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Mimosa

Stokes Bay, north coast of Kangaroo Island, South Australia

Mimosa was a ketch built in 02/03/1874 and lost on 14/04/1884. The Mimosa left Port Adelaide in ballast drawing two metres aft and one and a half metres forward. Bound for Moonta Bay, via Stokes Bay, Kangaroo Island, it intended to take in a cargo of timber at Stokes Bay. While lying there, half loaded in ballast mo

CategorySHIPWRECK
LocationStokes Bay, north coast of Kangaroo Island, South Australia
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1884
Oddness signal90/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceKetch; Wood; The Mimosa left Port Adelaide in ballast drawing two metres aft and one and a half metres forward. Bound for Moonta Bay, via Stokes Bay, Kangaroo Island, it intended to take in a cargo of timber at Stokes Bay. While lying there, half loaded in ballast mo

The oddity, explained

Why is Mimosa unusual?

Mimosa appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Mimosa was a ketch built in 02/03/1874 and lost on 14/04/1884. The Mimosa left Port Adelaide in ballast drawing two metres aft and one and a half metres forward. Bound for Moonta Bay, via Stokes Bay, Kangaroo Island, it intended to take in a cargo of timber at Stokes Bay. While lying there, half loaded in ballast mo. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check