Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Pastime

Between Stansbury and Wool Bay

Pastime was a cutter built in and lost on 23/05/1909. Unknown. On 17 May 1909 Pastime departed Edithburgh bound for Port Adelaide with one person on board (Wilson). The other usual crew members (1-2 persons) were left in Edithburgh and one stated that the vessel was leaking badly when it left. It was towing

CategorySHIPWRECK
LocationBetween Stansbury and Wool Bay
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1909
Oddness signal90/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceCutter; Unknown. On 17 May 1909 Pastime departed Edithburgh bound for Port Adelaide with one person on board (Wilson). The other usual crew members (1-2 persons) were left in Edithburgh and one stated that the vessel was leaking badly when it left. It was towing

The oddity, explained

Why is Pastime unusual?

Pastime appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Pastime was a cutter built in and lost on 23/05/1909. Unknown. On 17 May 1909 Pastime departed Edithburgh bound for Port Adelaide with one person on board (Wilson). The other usual crew members (1-2 persons) were left in Edithburgh and one stated that the vessel was leaking badly when it left. It was towing. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check