Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Konig Willem II

Guichen Bay, 3 miles east of Robe, South East coast of South Australia.

Konig Willem II was a ship built in 1840 and lost on 30/06/1857. On 25 June 1857 the Dutch ship, Koenig Willem II, arrived in Guichen Bay from Hong Kong, with 397 Chinese immigrants. During the voyage, this old vessel had leaked continually, taking on 12-15 inches (30-35 cm) of water per hour. The Chinese passengers h

CategorySHIPWRECK
LocationGuichen Bay, 3 miles east of Robe, South East coast of South Australia.
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1857
Oddness signal90/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceShip; Wood; On 25 June 1857 the Dutch ship, Koenig Willem II, arrived in Guichen Bay from Hong Kong, with 397 Chinese immigrants. During the voyage, this old vessel had leaked continually, taking on 12-15 inches (30-35 cm) of water per hour. The Chinese passengers h

The oddity, explained

Why is Konig Willem II unusual?

Konig Willem II appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Konig Willem II was a ship built in 1840 and lost on 30/06/1857. On 25 June 1857 the Dutch ship, Koenig Willem II, arrived in Guichen Bay from Hong Kong, with 397 Chinese immigrants. During the voyage, this old vessel had leaked continually, taking on 12-15 inches (30-35 cm) of water per hour. The Chinese passengers h. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check