Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Tenterden

Breaksea Reef, Cape Northumberland, 2Km Sw Of Port Macdonnell

Tenterden was a built in 5/1883 and lost on 23/12/1893. Mistake in bearings, struck a reef and broke up by sea. SS Tenterden left Melbourne in December 1893 bound for Beachport, SA, via Port MacDonnell, where 1300 bales of wool were waiting to be loaded. The vessel arrived off Port MacDonnell at midnight on 2

CategorySHIPWRECK
LocationBreaksea Reef, Cape Northumberland, 2Km Sw Of Port Macdonnell
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1893
Oddness signal90/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceIron; Mistake in bearings, struck a reef and broke up by sea. SS Tenterden left Melbourne in December 1893 bound for Beachport, SA, via Port MacDonnell, where 1300 bales of wool were waiting to be loaded. The vessel arrived off Port MacDonnell at midnight on 2

The oddity, explained

Why is Tenterden unusual?

Tenterden appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Tenterden was a built in 5/1883 and lost on 23/12/1893. Mistake in bearings, struck a reef and broke up by sea. SS Tenterden left Melbourne in December 1893 bound for Beachport, SA, via Port MacDonnell, where 1300 bales of wool were waiting to be loaded. The vessel arrived off Port MacDonnell at midnight on 2. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check