Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Amber Star

1 mile south of Cape Bouguer, Kangaroo Island

Amber Star was a cutter built in 1966 and lost on 14/01/1973. On 7 January, 1973, Amber Star, skippered by her part owner Gus Mere, with crewmen John Mere (21 years) and Siegmund Masierowski (19 years) of Ceduna, sailed from Port Adelaide for a shark fishing trip off the south coast of Kangaroo Island. After fis

CategorySHIPWRECK
Location1 mile south of Cape Bouguer, Kangaroo Island
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1973
Oddness signal84/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceCutter; Wood; On 7 January, 1973, Amber Star, skippered by her part owner Gus Mere, with crewmen John Mere (21 years) and Siegmund Masierowski (19 years) of Ceduna, sailed from Port Adelaide for a shark fishing trip off the south coast of Kangaroo Island. After fis

The oddity, explained

Why is Amber Star unusual?

Amber Star appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Amber Star was a cutter built in 1966 and lost on 14/01/1973. On 7 January, 1973, Amber Star, skippered by her part owner Gus Mere, with crewmen John Mere (21 years) and Siegmund Masierowski (19 years) of Ceduna, sailed from Port Adelaide for a shark fishing trip off the south coast of Kangaroo Island. After fis. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check