Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Moe

Garden Island Beach, east of water pipes and near the Gem and Sarnia, Port Adelaide, South Australia.

Moe was a barque built in 1876 and lost on 25/09/1931. In August 1928 the Habours Board was notified of the owners’ intention to scrap the hulk and permission was sought to scuttle it on the mudflats at the North Arm. Although approval was given, it was moved with permission and grounded, lying across the

CategorySHIPWRECK
LocationGarden Island Beach, east of water pipes and near the Gem and Sarnia, Port Adelaide, South Australia.
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1931
Oddness signal90/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceBarque; Iron; In August 1928 the Habours Board was notified of the owners’ intention to scrap the hulk and permission was sought to scuttle it on the mudflats at the North Arm. Although approval was given, it was moved with permission and grounded, lying across the

The oddity, explained

Why is Moe unusual?

Moe appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Moe was a barque built in 1876 and lost on 25/09/1931. In August 1928 the Habours Board was notified of the owners’ intention to scrap the hulk and permission was sought to scuttle it on the mudflats at the North Arm. Although approval was given, it was moved with permission and grounded, lying across the. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check