Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Balala

North side of Franklin Islands, 28 miles south of Ceduna, West Coast of South Australia.

Balala was a cutter built in and lost on 27/07/1946. A storm drove the vessel onto rocks. When the vessel had failed to return to Ceduna by 30 July, the local Flying Doctor aircraft was dispatched to search for it. The crew were spotted on the island and a boat was dispatched to pick them up.

CategorySHIPWRECK
LocationNorth side of Franklin Islands, 28 miles south of Ceduna, West Coast of South Australia.
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1946
Oddness signal90/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceCutter; Wood; A storm drove the vessel onto rocks. When the vessel had failed to return to Ceduna by 30 July, the local Flying Doctor aircraft was dispatched to search for it. The crew were spotted on the island and a boat was dispatched to pick them up.

The oddity, explained

Why is Balala unusual?

Balala appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Balala was a cutter built in and lost on 27/07/1946. A storm drove the vessel onto rocks. When the vessel had failed to return to Ceduna by 30 July, the local Flying Doctor aircraft was dispatched to search for it. The crew were spotted on the island and a boat was dispatched to pick them up. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check