Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Pelamis

Fishery Bay, South Australia

Pelamis was a none built in 1944 and lost on 28/04/1965. Pelamis was shark fishing off Liguanea Island, 20 miles south-west of Port Lincoln, in the early morning of 28 April 1965 when it ran onto rocks on the north side of the island and was badly holed and commenced taking on water. The master, Lawrence Vahlb

CategorySHIPWRECK
LocationFishery Bay, South Australia
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1965
Oddness signal84/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceNone; Wood; Pelamis was shark fishing off Liguanea Island, 20 miles south-west of Port Lincoln, in the early morning of 28 April 1965 when it ran onto rocks on the north side of the island and was badly holed and commenced taking on water. The master, Lawrence Vahlb

The oddity, explained

Why is Pelamis unusual?

Pelamis appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Pelamis was a none built in 1944 and lost on 28/04/1965. Pelamis was shark fishing off Liguanea Island, 20 miles south-west of Port Lincoln, in the early morning of 28 April 1965 when it ran onto rocks on the north side of the island and was badly holed and commenced taking on water. The master, Lawrence Vahlb. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check