Maritime · Evidence-led place record

Katey

4.5 nm NW of Lacy Island, 50 km south of Ceduna, South Australia

Katey was a built in 1960 and lost on 25/09/1977. Katey was trawling for prawns on the morning of 25 September 1977, about 4.5 nautical miles northwest of Lacy Island, when it began to fill with water. This was possibly caused by one of the otter boards holing the hull, and it quickly sank in about 30 m

CategorySHIPWRECK
Location4.5 nm NW of Lacy Island, 50 km south of Ceduna, South Australia
DatasetSouth Australian Shipwrecks
Listed/year1977
Oddness signal84/99
Data completeness90%
SignificanceWood; Katey was trawling for prawns on the morning of 25 September 1977, about 4.5 nautical miles northwest of Lacy Island, when it began to fill with water. This was possibly caused by one of the otter boards holing the hull, and it quickly sank in about 30 m

The oddity, explained

Why is Katey unusual?

Katey appears here because the approved source classifies it as maritime. The source describes it as Katey was a built in 1960 and lost on 25/09/1977. Katey was trawling for prawns on the morning of 25 September 1977, about 4.5 nautical miles northwest of Lacy Island, when it began to fill with water. This was possibly caused by one of the otter boards holing the hull, and it quickly sank in about 30 m. Heritage Atlas treats that specific classification-and-description combination as the oddity; the score is a comparative discovery signal, not proof of mystery or the supernatural. Compare nearby records and the linked country or category collection to understand how this entry relates to places supported by the same governed evidence.

Evidence and further exploration

The coordinate, category and description remain tied to the cited source. Comparative oddness helps discovery; it does not add facts that the source does not provide.

Data last collected: 3 September 2026 for this retained atlas release. Page and source last rechecked: 3 September 2026. Treat the record as a research starting point: open the original source, confirm current access conditions and compare the mapped location with local guidance before travelling. A missing field means the approved source did not support it; it is not evidence that the feature or restriction does not exist.

Inspect the original evidence source ↗

Heritage place shortlist

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check